Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Webbi) Shantabai v State of Bombay The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1948, he executed an unregistered document, that called itself a lease, in favour of his wife, the petitioner. The deed gives her the right to enter upon certain areas in the zamindari in order to cut and take out WebbSHANTABAI V. STATE OF BOMBAY Movable & Immovable Property Transfer of Property act By Bhawna Hey everyone, i am Bhawna Vishwakarma and welcome to Bhawn...

500 Words Case Analysis of Shanta Bai v. State of Bombay, 1958

Webb14 maj 2024 · Part -1 (Case analysis) Smt SHANTABAI v. STATE OF BOMBAY AIR 1958 SC 532 LegalKarona 1.29K subscribers Subscribe 2K views 2 years ago Amit kumar singh … WebbPETITIONER: SHRIMATI SHANTABAI Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF BOMBAY & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/03/1958 BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ) BENCH: DAS, … cindy kimberly and justin bieber https://bavarianintlprep.com

dulawnotes.files.wordpress.com

WebbState of Bombay – AIR 1958 SC 532. This case was a landmark case that laid down the test to determine when timber trees are standing timber and when they are immovable … WebbShantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 ISSUE: Is a tree an immovable property and what is the distinction between the tree and standing timber? What is the distinction … WebbSmt. Shantabai v/s State of Bombay and Others Petition No. 104 of 1957 Decided On, 24 March 1958 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE S. R. DASS (CJI) By, … diabetic atkins

Comments on: Shantabai v. State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532

Category:Understanding the term ‘Benefits to arise out of land’ - Academike

Tags:Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Case Analysis Shantabai v. State of Bomb PDF - Scribd

Webb18 sep. 1995 · Shantabai, AIR 1982 Bombay 231 and Ram Pyari v. Dharam Das, AIR 1984 Allahabad 147). The present suit was legally maintainable. ... ...the decision of the … WebbState of Bombay, 1959 SCR 265 = AIR 1958 SC 532 where similar questions as are involved in the instant case were examined. It was laid down therein that rights conferred under the contracts, which were substantially similar to those that are in question before us, partook of the nature of interest in immovable property.

Shantabai v. state of bombay air 1958 sc 532

Did you know?

Webb2 apr. 2016 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532: (1959) SCR 265 VIVIAN BOSE, J. - 8. The petitioner’s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of Pandharpur. On April 26, 1 Webb25 maj 2024 · The Court is disabled from using the instrument as evidence and hence it goes out of consideration in this case, hook, line and sinker (vide Shantabai v. State of Bombay [AIR 1958 SC 532 : 1959 SCR 265], Satish Chand Makhan v. Govardhan Das Byas [(1984) 1 SCC 369]

Webb21 juli 2000 · State of Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532 and the fact that the applicant...Bombay, AIR 1958 SC 532. According to him, the present case is one of profits a prendre. The …

WebbShantabai v. State of Bombay & Ors., AIR 1958 SC 532. 3 f Certain restrictions are put on the cutting, and the felling of certain trees is prohibited. That is the substance of the … WebbCase Law PROPERTY. LAW Presentation RAINA DUA Case Details Case Name Shrimati Shantabai vs State of Bombay. Case 1958 AIR SC Citation 532. Court Supreme Court Facts The petitioners husband Balirambhau doye was a zamindar of Pandharpur . On 26t April 1948 he executed an unregistered document that called itself a lease in favor of his wife .

WebbTitagarh Paper Mills Company Limited AIR 1985 SC 1293. Right to enter upon land and cut trees is a benefit arising out of land - Shantabai V. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532. c. Congregation of buyers and sellers is enough to constitute a bazaar and the right to hold a bazaar is an interest in the land - Bibi Sayeeda v. State of Bihar (1996) 9 ...

WebbSmt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay. AIR 1958 SC 532: (1959) SCR 265. VIVIAN BOSE, J. - 8. The petitioner‘s husband, Balirambhau Doye, was the Zamindar of. Pandharpur. On April … cindy kimberly and madison beerWebb3 mars 2024 · In the case of Smt.Shantabai v. State of Bombay [19], the court held that the right to enter the land, cut and carry away wood over a period of 12 years is a benefit arising out of land and hence immovable property. In the case of Anand Bahera v. Province of Orissa [20], it was held that profit emerging out of land is movable property. diabetic attack out of itWebbSave Save Shantabai vs State of Bombay For Later. 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 72 views 7 pages. Shantabai Vs State of Bombay. Original Title: ... 1959 SCR 265 : AIR 1958 SC 532. In the Supreme Court of India (BEFORE SUDHI RANJAN DAS, C.J. AND T.L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR, SUDHANSHU KUMAR DAS, A.K. SARKAR AND … cindy kimberly bathing suitWebb16 juli 2024 · Smt. Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Headnote Petn. No. 104 of 1957 decided on … diabetic attract ticksWebbIn Shantabai v. State of Bombay, 1959 SCR 265: (AIR 1958 SC 532) petitions similar to those in Chhotahai Jethabhai's case met a different fate. Shantabai who claimed the benefit of Art. 19 (1) (f) and (g) had been given a right by her husband to take and appropriate all kinds of wood from his Zamindari forests. The document was unregistered. diabetic asthmatic cadWebbShrimati Shantabai Vs. State of Bombay & Ors [1958] INSC 25 (24 March 1958) 1958 Latest Caselaw 25 SC. Section 105. TPA, Lease defined. By an unregistered document … diabetic attack not enough sugarWebb30 juni 2024 · State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Legal Maxim Home Shantabai v. State of Bombay AIR 1958 SC 532 Facts A, the owner of a forest, executed an unregistered … diabetic audit tool